<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good teaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voxygen.net/2006/06/good-teaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voxygen.net/2006/06/good-teaching/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christi</title>
		<link>http://voxygen.net/2006/06/good-teaching/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Christi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxygen.net/temp/2006/06/good-teaching/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Okay, as the wife of an Assessment Director at an state University I&#039;m going to agree with you -- but reservedly on your observation about University teaching and the whole &quot;objectives, standards, guiding questions&quot; issue.  I think teachers at the University want to get at the things such questions provide, however, the terminology, or rhetoric, is a problem -- especially in the humanities.  The idea of measuring &quot;objectives&quot; whether course of student identified is an uphill battle.  There is always the teacher who claims &quot;I am the expert in my field and only I can know if the students in my class got what I say they get.&quot;  On the other hand, progress is being made.  I&#039;ve seen many more faculty working to give evidence of student progress and proof of the standards they hold to get this progress.  It&#039;s the neverending college parodox that your degree gives you expert status, but it doesn&#039;t prove you can teach what you know.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am very interested in knowing whatelse you are getting in the institute.  It all sounds like a lot to process in a short time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, as the wife of an Assessment Director at an state University I&#8217;m going to agree with you &#8212; but reservedly on your observation about University teaching and the whole &#8220;objectives, standards, guiding questions&#8221; issue.  I think teachers at the University want to get at the things such questions provide, however, the terminology, or rhetoric, is a problem &#8212; especially in the humanities.  The idea of measuring &#8220;objectives&#8221; whether course of student identified is an uphill battle.  There is always the teacher who claims &#8220;I am the expert in my field and only I can know if the students in my class got what I say they get.&#8221;  On the other hand, progress is being made.  I&#8217;ve seen many more faculty working to give evidence of student progress and proof of the standards they hold to get this progress.  It&#8217;s the neverending college parodox that your degree gives you expert status, but it doesn&#8217;t prove you can teach what you know.  </p>
<p>I am very interested in knowing whatelse you are getting in the institute.  It all sounds like a lot to process in a short time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

