It’s All About the Galleons

Harry Potter is all the rage, of course. Some people are happy about that and others aren’t. Crooked Dimwit is one of those who isn’t.

Annoyed and exhausted by the Harry Potter hype, Crooked Dimwit argues that the media overstates Harry’s pre-eminence at the box office. Because the rating system ignores inflation, HP rankings are actually exaggerated. When adjusted for inflation, Gone with the Wind ranks the highest grossing movie of all time while HP ranks well at the bottom half of the top 100 box office earners. As an aside, I just HAVE to point out that GWTW has *sixty* years of re-releases added into its total whereas HP has been released for, what, three weeks? In sixty years, we’ll see who’s the head boy, bucko.

I personally think commercialization besmirches the beloved HP books. True, a lot of people think that the books themselves aren’t all that grand. They consider them to be rather generic. I agree. They _are_ generic. Generic, as in, a member of a genre, children’s fantasy literature. And an excellent member at that. I love Harry Potter because of JKR’s sense of verbal play and her very British sense of humor. I laugh every time I read the names of wizards, books, spells, and candy. I also get surprised by her plot twists and turns. I _never_ guessed that the bad guy in book for is *OOPS*….never mind. People like to rail that these books aren’t “timeless” “literature.” But I personally don’t really care about all those tired old high-culture/low-culture arguments that have long ago proven to be culturally and historically relative.

So what’s my issue with Harry Potter, then?

Well, Crooked Dimwit’s biggest complaint is the news media who report box office figures as _news_. The “Magic of Harry Potter” is really just media spin, he claims, and hardly newsworthy.

Well, I cannot blame him. I agree that HP has been grossly over-commercialized (grossly over-commercialized? Isn’t that redundant?), an on-going problem for Harry Potter’s fans. I don’t just mean commercialized as in advertising. I mean, _across the board_, it’s been all about the galleons. Remember, WB bullied kids about their fan sites over copyright issues. Not to mention the ugly controversy about JKR plagiarizing (the very notion of intellectual property is an effect of commerce, after all). Or the even uglier controversy about Harry’s demonic associations for the Christian Right (another effect of commerce, but that’s another story). Or the controversy about multiple toy companies getting licensing rights. Or JKR’s supposed “I hate action figure” deals with Coke. Not to mention Robbie Coltrane’s recent rant because WB can skip royalty payments because they didn’t use his likeness for the Hagrid dolls.

Yet, despite murmurs of boycotts, we all went to see the film, and we all still buy the over-marketed/cross-marketed products.

Maybe it’s all part of the dumbing down of America, which has evil kinship with grade inflation, the explosion of Wal-Mart’s across the country, and Mediocre George II’s presumable “rise to the challenge of the presidency during a time of crisis” (still yet another effect of commerce, and maybe it’s all part of the very -same- story).

So, like Crooked Dimwit, I’m too annoyed with the hypercapitalism of Harry–or as Rex Murphy calls him, Frankenpotter. But I’m not that naive. I stopped believing that news media actually reports news a long time ago. If you doubt me, though, here’s an obvious, visible piece of evidence to show that the news media is just one big Madison Avenue advertisement.
If you follow the dollar..erm..galleon, you will see that AOL-Time Warner owns the rights to Harry Potter. AOL-Time Warner also owns or is related to:

Moviefone
Ebay
American Greetings
Ticketmaster
Hewlett Packard
Book-of-the-Month Club
Little, Brown & Co.
HBO
Fortune
People Magazine
Turner Entertainment
Time Magazine (obviously)
And
CNN.

So if you think you see Harry EVERYWHERE, it’s because you ARE seeing Harry everywhere. It’s called product placement and cross-marketing. And news reports are just another version of product placement. Here is the perfect example to prove my point. CNN Money has a dollar to galleon converter on it currency conversion page, which you can check out.

Harry Potter Currency Converter

Related posts:

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

She blog,
he blog-a we blog.
She blog, she blogs.

They say I better stop or I'll go blind.
     -- Cyndi Lauper

Archives